Posts Tagged Cash for Clunkers

News You Can Believe – Thursday Oct 29, 2009

Cash For Clunkers

Taxpayers Paid $24K Per ‘cash For Clunkers’ Vehicle

The average rebate was $4,000. But the overwhelming majority of sales would have taken place anyway at some time in the last half of 2009, according to Edmunds.com. That means the government ended up spending about $24,000 each for those 125,000 additional vehicle sales.

William A. Jacobson

It Took Just Minutes To Find Profound Stupidity In Pelosi’s Bill

…This provision creates incentives for businesses to keep down payroll. One way would be not to hire anyone whose compensation would fall under the definition of payroll under the bill.

In other words, outsource whatever you can. Hire a software engineer in India, or ship manufacturing to China, or structure your business in such a way that you send 1099s not W-2s to the people who work for you (and hire an accountant and tax lawyer to navigate IRS rules on independent contractors).

The message of the bill is that whatever you do, if you want to grow your business without paying the health care tax, do not add employees.

, ,

No Comments

Cash For Clunkers Driving Up Prices

Following from Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion:

The much ballyhooed Cash for Clunkers program has had the unintended consequences of driving up the cost of new and used vehicles and used auto parts, according to independent studies of the auto markets. The Cash for Clunkers program demonstrates the danger of government trying to micro-manage supply and demand, and is a warning as to the dangers of Democratic plans for health care restructuring and a cap-and-trade system.

In a press release issued on Friday, August 7, 2009, Edmunds.com released the data on the effect of the program on new car prices. Edmunds found that the government-funded incentives had caused car dealers to reduce the discounts off manufacturers suggested retail:

“Since the program launched, we’ve seen that shoppers are getting less of a discount off sticker price for new cars,” notes Senior Analyst Michelle Krebs in her report on Edmunds’ AutoObserver.com. “In some cases, they are choosing less expensive trim levels and option packages than had been typical in recent months, but paying more for them.”

Edmunds also found that the incentive program came at the worst possible time:

“In truth, this program launched at the worst possible time of the year,” opined Edmunds.com CEO Jeremy Anwyl. “The annual summer sell-down typically creates a rush of activity for the industry, and this year that rush came right after automakers cut production in response to the floundering economy. It’s a simple case of supply and demand, bolstered by a reduced level of negotiation on the part of excited clunker traders. Add to this the automakers’ unseasonable reduction in incentives and the message is clear: if you buy a car this summer, you should expect to pay higher prices.”

2009-08-09_181303As if price increases for new cars were not bad enough, the Cash for Clunkers program also appears to be driving up prices on used cars, creating a bubble in prices and the danger of a collapse in car demand. According to the Kelley Blue Book August Report:

With a total of 750,000 vehicles being removed from the marketplace, dealers are stocking up on used inventory in anticipation of low supply and high demand. This scenario is driving used-car prices up significantly in the short term, causing a bubble in values that will seriously impact used-vehicle values when the Cash for Clunkers program ends.

“Dealerships have reported increased foot traffic, creating a false sense of automotive market recovery,” said Alec Gutierrez, senior analyst of vehicle valuation for Kelley Blue Book. “As a result, dealers are going to auction to restock inventory, driving up used-car values. However, the effect of a supply reduction of this magnitude could have an immense impact on these values in the short-term, exacerbating the already-limited supply at auction. If this bubble comes to pass, dealerships will end up with excess inventory of both new and used vehicles and be forced to offer deep discounts to remove surplus inventory, driving values down. Ultimately, there will be the possibility of a severe contraction in auto sales as soon as the Cash for Clunkers program runs out of funding.”

But there’s more. The Cash for Clunkers programs is likely to drive up used car parts prices according to dealers who were interviewed for a Dayton Daily News article. While I haven’t seen any independent evaluation similar to the new and used car reports linked above, it makes sense that destroying working used cars would take the parts from those cars off the market, thereby decreasing the supply of used parts.

While Cash for Clunkers is being portrayed as a success, in reality it is driving up prices for consumers of all vehicles and used parts, but hits used car buyers and those who cannot afford a new car the hardest because the government rebates only apply to new vehicles. More important, this government program is likely to create a substantial distortion of market forces and a collapse of demand once the program ends.

Only in Washington could a program which uses borrowed money to drive up consumer prices, including a bubble in used car prices, be considered a success. I can’t wait for health care restructuring and cap-and-trade.

, ,

No Comments

Cash For Clunkers

When President Bush refunded money back to the people that was simply returning our tax dollars back to the owners – everyone benefited.

This “Cash for Clunkers” is taking my tax dollars and giving them to someone else so they can buy a car -I resent that!  Why should I be forced to help someone else buy a new car?

, ,

No Comments

Health Care Revolt

My favorte quote of the day:

“I look at this HealthCare plan, I see nothing that is about “health” or about “care”. What I see is a bureaucratic nightmare. Medicaid is broke! Medicare is broke! Social Security is broke! And you want us to believe that a government that can’t even run a “Cash for Clunkers” program is going to run 1/7th of all US economy? No Sir! No!”


, , ,

No Comments

Hope and Change Equals More Of The Same

Following from the Tammy Bruce Website:

Tammy spoke of the “Cash for Clunkers” program. I think the topic is worthy of a highlight, in that it exemplifies everything that’s insanely wrong with the trend of our economic “recovery” programs.

[...]

It’s terribly ironic to see the candidate who promised “change” has nothing to offer but more of the same bad policies that made the mess in the first place. Borrowing money to fuel a consumption binge, while it may provide a small and temporary restoration of business as usual, actually adds fuel to the long-term problem.

Consider what “Cash for Clunkers” is supposed to accomplish. In a nutshell, the goal is to take working cars and trash them. Doesn’t that sound just a little bit weird when you think about it? The nation is hurting economically, so we take some of our stuff and destroy it, on the theory that we’ll become more prosperous by rebuilding the stuff that we intentionally demolished. If that makes sense, then the 9/11 terrorists did us a hell of a favor by knocking down buildings. Gosh, think of all the construction jobs they generated! Maybe we should bomb our own buildings as part of the restoration program.

[...]

Okay, so in a time of hardship, the nation is squandering its remaining wealth. But at least it’s green, right? If we’re beggaring ourselves, isn’t it for a green planet?

No it’s not! Dammit, the greenest thing you can do with a clunker is to keep it running. It takes a *lot* of resources to build a new car, and relatively few resources to keep a good car running. So you’re actively harming the environment by trashing a working car and building another…even if the new car gets better mileage. The “green” thing to do is to nurse your car along, and maybe try to drive it less. When your clunker car has reached the end of its life and you’re contemplating a new purchase…that’s the time to think “green”.

[...]

I don’t know what else to say. Our political leadership, in a time of crisis, has chosen the path of economic and ecological suicide, not to mention child sacrifice.

Read the rest of the story…


,

No Comments